The need for more high-quality social housing is a pressing issue, one that you would expect the housing secretary to prioritize. However, under successive incumbents and governments, it has consistently failed to be at the top of the political agenda. This neglect has led to worsening conditions for those living in social housing, with persistent reports of damp, overcrowding, rat infestations, and poor maintenance. Michael Gove seems to acknowledge this reality, stating, “The quality of social housing, particularly in some parts of the country, remains scandalously poor.” He also noted the necessity of creating proper incentives for social housing providers to improve existing stock while also increasing the number of available homes.
Substandard social housing doesn’t just affect individual tenants—it has a broader impact on entire communities. When social housing is poorly maintained, it exacerbates issues related to health, education, and employment. Damp and overcrowded conditions contribute to respiratory illnesses, while unstable housing can disrupt children's schooling. Additionally, deteriorating housing conditions can lower the overall standard of living in an area, leading to increased crime rates and social disengagement. If the government is serious about its "levelling up" agenda, addressing these systemic problems in social housing should be a central focus.
Social housing plays a crucial role in the wider property market. The shortage of social housing has led to a growing reliance on the private rented sector (PRS). With demand now exceeding supply in the PRS, the question of how people will be housed is becoming a significant issue. For many low-income households, the private rental market is unaffordable, leaving them with few options other than substandard accommodation or, in the worst cases, homelessness. If the government truly wants to ease pressure on the housing market, increasing the supply of social housing must be part of the solution.
One of the most pressing concerns is that the supply of social housing has not kept pace with demand. Over the years, successive governments have sold off large portions of social housing stock through policies such as Right to Buy, without adequately replacing what was lost. This has left a growing number of families on waiting lists, sometimes for years, with little hope of securing a suitable home. Michael Gove has acknowledged this imbalance, stating that “the supply of social housing overall has not kept pace with demand.” But acknowledgment alone is not enough—concrete action is needed. This includes significant investment in new social housing developments and better regulation to ensure that existing housing is properly maintained.
A key challenge in addressing social housing issues is ensuring that housing providers are held accountable for maintaining and improving their properties. Gove mentioned the need for “proper incentivisation” for social housing providers to both improve stock and increase numbers. This could take the form of financial incentives for housing associations and local authorities that meet high standards, alongside stronger penalties for those that fail to provide safe and decent living conditions. Tenant advocacy groups and housing regulators must also be empowered to ensure that complaints are taken seriously and that action is swiftly taken to resolve issues
The fact that a senior government minister has publicly admitted that something must be done about social housing is a step in the right direction. However, words must be backed by action. If the government is serious about "levelling up," then improving social housing should be a fundamental part of that strategy. This means:
Ultimately, the conversation around social housing cannot be delayed any longer. It is not just a matter of policy—it is about providing people with the dignity of safe, stable, and affordable homes. Whether this government will rise to the challenge remains to be seen.
Meet our Expert Property Commentators