Scotland has already implemented a housing court system, allowing landlords to take swift and efficient action against problem tenants. With increasing legal challenges in the private rental sector, could the rest of the UK benefit from a similar approach?
A survey by the Residential Landlords Association (RLA) found that nearly 4 out of 5 landlords who have used the courts for repossession are dissatisfied with how they operate. Additionally, an overwhelming 91% of landlords support the introduction of a dedicated housing court.
We have been campaigning for the retention of Section 21, which allows landlords to regain possession of their properties without needing to prove fault. If the Government abolishes it, the already overwhelmed court system will struggle even more. The process of repossessing a property already takes months, and delays will likely worsen without significant reform.
It’s not just landlords who are frustrated. A report by Citizens Advice found that tenants also avoid taking legal action against landlords due to the lengthy and complicated process. More than half of tenants surveyed felt the system was too slow, preventing them from holding landlords accountable for property issues.
The current legal framework discourages both landlords and tenants from seeking justice. As a result, many tenants remain in poorly maintained homes, while landlords face difficulties removing problematic tenants.
A well-funded, specialist housing court could be the solution. The RLA has stated that if Section 21 is removed, “significant and bold” reforms are essential for the court system. Improving the legal process would benefit both landlords and tenants—but we believe Section 21 should remain in place to ensure balance and fairness in the rental market.!
Meet our Expert Property Commentators