Rinlgley group logo
  • Home
  • Who We Are
    About Us Our People Awards Savings for Clients Results for Clients Green Management Strategies Market Overview Leasehold Reform Campaign Money Back Guarantee
  • What We Do
    • Block Management
      • Block Management Overview
      • for RTM Companies
      • for Freehold Management Companies
      • for Resident Management Companies
      • for Estates of Houses
      • for Freeholder Investors
      • Ground Rent Collection
      • How to Change Agent
      • Block Management Packages
      • Can't Afford an Agent?
      • Legal work & Tribunals
      • Section 20 Major Works
      • Ringley's Top 10 Tips
      • Staff on Site
      • Moving or Buying?
      • Report an Incident
    • Asset Management
      • Asset Management Overview
        • Asset Management Overview
        • Stabilised Assets
        • Project Monitoring
        • Mobilisation & Lease up
        • Asset Managers TechStack
        • Accounting & Reporting
        • Brands & URLs for sale
        • ESG Consultancy & Implementation
        • UK Build to Rent
        • UK Later Living
        • UK Coliving
        • UK Student Housing
        • BTR Smart PropTech
        • BTR Strategic Marketing
        • BTR Resident Experience
        • BTR Tenancy Management
        • Asset Management Clients
        • Site Finding/Digital Land Search
      • Law
        • Legal Services Overview
        • Our People
        • Recommendations
        • Right to Manage
        • Lease Extensions
        • Freehold Purchase
        • Absentee Freeholder
        • Court Appointed Manager
        • Conveyancing
        • Service Charge/Rent Arrears Recovery
        • Company Secretary
      • Valuation
        • Valuation Overview
        • Loan Security
        • Company Accounts
        • Lease Extensions
        • Freehold Purchase
        • Rent Reviews
        • Development Valuations
        • Insurance Valuations
        • Expert Witness & Litigation
        • Tax, Trusts & Accounts Valuations
        • Trading Business
        • Compulsory Purchase
        • Residential Valuations
      • Engineering
        • Engineering Overview
        • EWS1 Consultancy
        • Asbestos
        • Contract Administration
        • Fire Assesment
        • Homebuyer Survey
        • Building Survey
        • Schedules
        • Party Wall Matters
        • Principle Designer
        • Disability Access Audits
        • Small Building Works
      • Finance
        • Finance Overview
        • Get Accounts Quote
        • The Law & Property Accounts
        • Industry Update
        • To audit or Not?
      • Plant & Facilities Management
        • Plant & Facilities Management
        • Fire Door Inspection APP
      • Site Staffing Solutions
      • Leasehold Guidance
        • Leasehold Guidance Overview
        • Right to Manage
        • Buy Freehold
        • Court Appointed Manager
        • Absentee Freeholder
    • Insights
      Property Management Articles Property Management Blogs Rental Market Blogs Customer Comments FAQ - Ask Our Experts
    • E-books
    • Portal Login
    • Get In Touch
    • Clear Filter
    • Property Blog INDEX
    • PlanetRent Blog

    Finally, resident controlled blocks of flats and Freeholders can relax


    Responsive image


    We're talking about the landmark decision in the Daejan case announced (March 6th) this week. Previously the Daejan decisions all the way to the Court of Appeal was that Section 20 was black or white - either you consulted or you paid the cost. Effectively meant that if a landlord of a block of flats (often now the flat owners collectively) messed up or agreed to try to waive the Statutory Consultation required by the 1985 Landlord and Tenant Act then they lost out badly. Arguably, not ruin if you are wealthy landlord like Daejan (one of Englands biggest residential landlords) but terrible if you are an unpaid volunteer Director of a block of flats and fellow leaseholders turn against you finding a legitimate way to opt out of paying service charges leaving you footing the bill.

    Section 20 Consultation is required on 'works' not gardening or window cleaning but repairs and works to lifts and plant. The statutory threshold is £250 for any leaseholder (so no simple maths there) as penthouses with big percentages may reach the limit quickly.

    Victory for flatsWhat the case held is that in the absence of proper procedures - if the landlord retrospectively applies to the Tribunal for a dispensation - then his loss from not having complied with procedures with be the difference between cost of the works and the cost of a reasonable alternative. So landlords no longer face a total loss situation of the whole cost of the works less £250 per service charge payer - perhaps say the difference between a £100,000 bill and a £120,000 bill.

    This is why all the unpaid volunteers in small blocks of flats can now sleep a little more easily at night.

    Mary-anne Bowring is Group MD of Ringley Chartered Surveyors arguably northern London's biggest manager of leasehold property. Based right here in Camden Town.


    OVERVIEW OF THE DAEJAN CASE

    The Daejan case, concerned £280,000 of major works at Queens Mansions in Muswell Hill. The leaseholders claimed that Daejan failed to follow the statutory consultation requirements and their application for a dispensation should bot be allowed.

    As high as the Court of Appeal the Courts sided with the leaseholders who thought they could get out of paying all service charge bar £250 towards the works.

    Then on the 6th March 2013 the Supreme Court ruled in favour of Daejan. The dispensation was not all, but most of the cost of the disputed major works.

    President Lord Neuberger and two of four judges, found that whilst Daejan had failed to properly follow the consultation requirements the lessees were little prejudiced.

    Two areas of potential prejudice were considered:
    1) Had tthe leaseholders paid for inappropriate works,
    2), Had the leaseholders paid more than would be appropriate.

    Lord Neuberger held that the only evidence of prejudice lay in the choice of contractor. The decision therefore reduced the potentially recoverable costs of the works by £50,000 to from £280,000 to £230,000.

    Daejan is a new precedent and Courts and Tribunals will now in future consider the degree of prejudice suffered by the leaseholders not how greatly the consultation requirements were breached. Essentially it moves on decision making from the black or white 'dispensation or no dispensation from consultation' and considers the actual outcome and impact upon the leaseholders concerned.

    The industry is lauding this as a victory for common sense and fairness for both landlord and lessee.

    Daejan is a new precedent and will leave leaseholders thinking twice before thinking they can simply not pay. Future challenges will need to focus on the degree of prejudice suffered by the leaseholders rather than the degree to which the consultation requirements were breached.

    There will be no more black or white 'dispensation or no dispensation from consultation' cases instead cases that consider the actual outcome and impact upon the leaseholders concerned.

    Part 57 of Lord Neuberger's judgement reads: if a landlord were to carry out major works to the value of £1m but failed to comply with the consultation requirements to a small extent, eg in 'accidentally not having regard to an observation', it would be 'grossly disproportionate' to refuse the landlord dispensation. Instead, the degree of prejudice caused by the failure must be considered and the leaseholders' contributions reduced accordingly.

    So, the ruling does follow a great common sense approach which is welcomed but also provides that only by demonstrating no or minimal adverse effect on leaseholders can a breach of the requirements be defended.

    Ringley champion transparency in a way that few if any other Managing Agents do. Every invoice we pay and much more is available for inspection on our Client Gateway online.



    02/09/2020
    Author : Mary-Anne Bowring

    Social
    Facebook Linkedin Twitter Blogger

    Subscription

    Keep up to date

    (Weekly, fortnightly or monthly)


    To find out more what we do with your data, please read our Privacy Policy


    Insights, Blogs, Research, E-Books

    Landlord blog bg

    Landlord blog
    Read landlord blog
    Property blog bg

    Property blogs
    Read property blogs
    Articles bg

    Property articles
    Read property articles
    E book

    E-books
    Read E-books
    Facebook footer Instagram footer Linkedin footer Twitter footer
    Facebook footer
    Instagram footer
    Linkedin footer
    Twitter footer
    • Ringley Group
    • About us
    • CSR
    • BusyLiving
    • PlanetRent
    • Fire door inspection
    • Talk to us
    • Careers
    • Ask a Question
    • Insight
    • Articles
    • Blogs
    • Subscribe
    • What we do
    • Asset Management
    • Block Management
    • Facilities Management
    • Property Law
    • Surveying / Valuation
    • Building Engineering
    • Financial Services
    • Managing Agents
    • Block Management Locations
    • Co-working
    • Offices
    • London
    • Ringley House
    • 1 Castle Road
    • London
    • NW1 8PR
    • T: 0207 267 2900
    • Manchester
    • 11 Swan Street
    • Northern Quarter
    • Manchester
    • M4 5JJ
    • T: 0330 174 7777
    • Cardiff
    • 122 Bute Street
    • Cardiff Bay
    • Cardiff
    • CF10 5AE
    • T: 0330 174 7747
    • Email: solutions@ringley.co.uk
    • Emergency line 1: 0207 428 2056
    • Emergency line 2: 0207 267 2900
    • Report incident
    Privacy Policy
    Ringley Staff
    Ifsm Irpm member New iso Arla licensed Ombudsman services Rics vertical Gbc

    All content © copyright 2022. Ringley Limited. All Rights reserved. Ringley Limited, incorporated and registered in England and wales. Registered office: Ringley House, 1 Castle Road, London, NW1 8PR. Company No. 03302438
    Terms of use | Privacy Policy | Modern slavery act | COVID-19 risk assessment