Post-Grenfell, leaseholders trying to sell flats in blocks with cladding are facing new obstacles. Even buildings without combustible cladding are now being affected as mortgage lenders become increasingly cautious about building safety risks.
The EWS1 form was introduced as part of new mortgage lender regulations following Grenfell. It requires a qualified professional to carry out a fire-risk assessment and either confirm the absence of combustible materials or recommend remedial works. Without this form:
A major challenge for engineers and property professionals is that specified building materials do not always match what was actually used. There are also lookalike materials, copycat imports, and variations in fire class ratings that can impact a building's safety. What has changed most since Grenfell is the shift in focus to the entire building system rather than just the cladding. Professionals now need to assess:
The Hackett Review initially focused on high-rise residential buildings (HRRBs), but mortgage lenders have since applied its recommendations more broadly. This has led to delays in:
Leaseholders are suffering twice:
At the very least, the government could step in to prevent lenders from penalizing leaseholders with higher mortgage rates. More importantly, we strongly believe that the cost of fire risk testing should fall on the freeholder rather than leaseholders. As managing agents, we are doing our best to coordinate testing and help homeowners navigate this urgent and frustrating process.
Meet our Expert Property Commentators