A London estate agent is now advertising leasehold flats in a new-build block with no ground rent to pay—a first for the capital, according to the sales literature. While some developers have already been offering 999-year leases with no ground rent, this shift raises important questions about the impact on the property market.
Developers who remove ground rent tend to take one of two approaches:
Despite changes in legislation, many developers still sell their ground rents, as it remains a lucrative investment. The market has already adjusted investment yields since the government announced its plan to reduce ground rents to zero. The issue that has caused the most controversy is the doubling of ground rents by some freeholders, which has left leaseholders trapped in unfair agreements.
The government has promised reform to the Housing Act 1988 to tackle unfair ground rent clauses. However, the timeline for implementation remains uncertain, leaving leaseholders waiting for change.
While the abolition of ground rent may seem like a win for leaseholders, there is an argument for keeping it at a reasonable level. Freeholders who charge ground rent have a vested interest in maintaining their investment, ensuring that blocks are well-managed, compliant with regulations, and properly maintained. If ground rent is abolished completely, freeholders may cut corners or show little interest in the condition of their buildings.
A more balanced approach could be to:
As we discussed in last week’s blog, removing ground rent entirely could lead to freeholders losing all financial incentive to maintain buildings, resulting in health, safety, and compliance risks. The key is to strike a balance—one that protects leaseholders while ensuring that buildings remain safe and well-managed.
Meet our Expert Property Commentators