Rinlgley group logo
  • Home
  • Who We Are
    About Us Our People Awards Savings for Clients Results for Clients Green Management Strategies Market Overview Leasehold Reform Campaign Money Back Guarantee
  • What We Do
    • Block Management
      • Block Management Overview
      • for RTM Companies
      • for Freehold Management Companies
      • for Resident Management Companies
      • for Estates of Houses
      • for Freeholder Investors
      • Ground Rent Collection
      • How to Change Agent
      • Block Management Packages
      • Can't Afford an Agent?
      • Legal work & Tribunals
      • Section 20 Major Works
      • Ringley's Top 10 Tips
      • Staff on Site
      • Moving or Buying?
      • Report an Incident
    • Asset Management
      • Asset Management Overview
        • Asset Management Overview
        • Stabilised Assets
        • Project Monitoring
        • Mobilisation & Lease up
        • Asset Managers TechStack
        • Accounting & Reporting
        • Brands & URLs for sale
        • ESG Consultancy & Implementation
        • UK Build to Rent
        • UK Later Living
        • UK Coliving
        • UK Student Housing
        • BTR Smart PropTech
        • BTR Strategic Marketing
        • BTR Resident Experience
        • BTR Tenancy Management
        • Asset Management Clients
        • Site Finding/Digital Land Search
      • Law
        • Legal Services Overview
        • Our People
        • Recommendations
        • Right to Manage
        • Lease Extensions
        • Freehold Purchase
        • Absentee Freeholder
        • Court Appointed Manager
        • Conveyancing
        • Service Charge/Rent Arrears Recovery
        • Company Secretary
      • Valuation
        • Valuation Overview
        • Loan Security
        • Company Accounts
        • Lease Extensions
        • Freehold Purchase
        • Rent Reviews
        • Development Valuations
        • Insurance Valuations
        • Expert Witness & Litigation
        • Tax, Trusts & Accounts Valuations
        • Trading Business
        • Compulsory Purchase
        • Residential Valuations
      • Engineering
        • Engineering Overview
        • EWS1 Consultancy
        • Asbestos
        • Contract Administration
        • Fire Assesment
        • Homebuyer Survey
        • Building Survey
        • Schedules
        • Party Wall Matters
        • Principle Designer
        • Disability Access Audits
        • Small Building Works
      • Finance
        • Finance Overview
        • Get Accounts Quote
        • The Law & Property Accounts
        • Industry Update
        • To audit or Not?
      • Plant & Facilities Management
        • Plant & Facilities Management
        • Fire Door Inspection APP
      • Site Staffing Solutions
      • Leasehold Guidance
        • Leasehold Guidance Overview
        • Right to Manage
        • Buy Freehold
        • Court Appointed Manager
        • Absentee Freeholder
    • Insights
      Property Management Articles Property Management Blogs Rental Market Blogs Customer Comments FAQ - Ask Our Experts
    • E-books
    • Portal Login
    • Get In Touch

    How is the building safety regulator’s residents’ panel going to work?

    by Mary-Anne Bowring/Housing Today


    To be effective, the panel must be structured to prioritise the voices of building occupants over those of owners and non-occupying leaseholders

    Before the publication of the Building Safety Bill at the beginning of July, during pre-legislative scrutiny from the housing, communities and local government select committee, the government declared that the bill would “put residents at the heart” by “giving residents in higher-risk buildings a stronger voice”.

    The first phase of the bill is now in our hands, and the idea of a statutory committee in the form of a residents’ panel is firmly front and centre of the government’s strategy for resident engagement. The transition plan suggests it will be introduced at least 12 months after the bill becomes law, 10 months after the limitation period of the Defective Premises Act 1972 is extended.

    The message from the housing ministry seems to be that consultation with residents already made vulnerable will have to wait – while they grapple with the uncertainty of EWS1 forms, remediation costs, and negligence claims levied against building owners and developers.

    What is a residents’ panel in the context of the Building Safety Bill? What is its relationship with the building safety regulator? Is this a genuine attempt at meaningful engagement with those most deeply affected by the cladding scandal, and if so, why is it taking so long to be constituted?

    A residents’ panel is an incarnation of the “stronger voice” envisaged by the government, made up of residents of “higher-risk” buildings over 18m or seven storeys high, residents’ bodies, and representatives or advocates of residents, as well as non-occupying owners or leaseholders. According to the bill, the panel is to advise the regulator on strategy, complaints procedures and guidance relating to the safety of higher-risk buildings. The regulator is also required to consult the panel before issuing or revising guidance relating to duties owed to affected residents.

    On the face of it, the categories of engagement appear quite broad. The residents’ panel “must be consulted on guidance relating to residents’ engagement strategy, complaints, duties on residents and owners” or regulations made under any of those headings.

    A second reading, however, reveals a more limited picture of mandatory consultation outside of changes to “guidance”. In those instances, the regulator has discretion over whom to consult, so while the bill provides an example of engagement with the residents’ panel in a situation where the regulator wants to test publicity materials aimed at residents of higher-risk buildings, there’s no guarantee that the panel would be consulted where regulations are amended.

    The bill refers to the regulator being able “to call on the expertise of the residents’ panel for insight and support”, although this too may be undermined if the weighting of the panel is in favour of non-occupying owners or leaseholders. An effective residents’ panel must put the safety of residents in occupation of higher-risk buildings first, which ultimately means providing the right resources to empower those residents to contribute.

    It is difficult to visualise a residents’ panel that does not look like a forum when eligibility is as broad as proposed. The government concedes that it “expects the role of the residents’ panel to evolve over time”, although the issue of who is liable to pay remediation costs is, if unresolved, likely to turn a residents’ panel into a single-issue crucible.

    The Grenfell Inquiry should serve as an education in the time, detail and personally sensitive nature that needs to be accorded to matters of personal safety. It is a lesson in putting the lived experiences of those most exposed to the “higher risk” that is so casually explained. A residents’ panel, as hopeful as the idea is, cannot undermine the importance of focused dialogue with those who are living in the wake of the cladding scandal.

    For the residents’ panel to work, the government needs to set a precedent on what the ideal panel may look like. It must clearly separate the issues faced by occupants and those of owners and non-occupying leaseholders, and put to bed the issue of remediation costs before looking to the panel as a consultee. The panel can only serve as a genuine and representative body for change if its primary concern is safety, rather than survival in the face of excessive debt.

    Each member of the panel needs to be given their own set of responsibilities to ensure the process is streamlined from the outset. This prevents it from being a box-ticking exercise and fosters a continuity of consultation that embeds residents’ concerns at the heart of decision-making. It ought to be collaborative, without giving undue weight to those with seasoned representation.

    A “stronger voice” must be the accumulation of many, rather than the preponderance of one.


    https://www.housingtoday.co.uk/comment/how-is-the-building-safety-regulators-residents-panel-going-to-work/5112903.article

    Responsive image
    Subscription

    Keep up to date

    (Weekly, fortnightly or monthly)


    To find out more what we do with your data, please read our Privacy Policy


    Insights, Blogs, Research, E-Books

    Landlord blog bg

    Landlord blog
    Read landlord blog
    Property blog bg

    Property blogs
    Read property blogs
    Articles bg

    Property articles
    Read property articles
    E book

    E-books
    Read E-books
    Facebook footer Instagram footer Linkedin footer Twitter footer
    Facebook footer
    Instagram footer
    Linkedin footer
    Twitter footer
    • Ringley Group
    • About us
    • CSR
    • BusyLiving
    • PlanetRent
    • Fire door inspection
    • Talk to us
    • Careers
    • Ask a Question
    • Insight
    • Articles
    • Blogs
    • Subscribe
    • What we do
    • Asset Management
    • Block Management
    • Facilities Management
    • Property Law
    • Surveying / Valuation
    • Building Engineering
    • Financial Services
    • Managing Agents
    • Block Management Locations
    • Co-working
    • Offices
    • London
    • Ringley House
    • 1 Castle Road
    • London
    • NW1 8PR
    • T: 0207 267 2900
    • Manchester
    • 11 Swan Street
    • Northern Quarter
    • Manchester
    • M4 5JJ
    • T: 0330 174 7777
    • Cardiff
    • 122 Bute Street
    • Cardiff Bay
    • Cardiff
    • CF10 5AE
    • T: 0330 174 7747
    • Email: solutions@ringley.co.uk
    • Emergency line 1: 0207 428 2056
    • Emergency line 2: 0207 267 2900
    • Report incident
    Privacy Policy
    Ringley Staff
    Ifsm Irpm member New iso Arla licensed Ombudsman services Rics vertical Gbc

    All content © copyright 2022. Ringley Limited. All Rights reserved. Ringley Limited, incorporated and registered in England and wales. Registered office: Ringley House, 1 Castle Road, London, NW1 8PR. Company No. 03302438
    Terms of use | Privacy Policy | Modern slavery act | COVID-19 risk assessment