Last week, we explored the potential problems of the government's proposal to scrap "no-fault" Section 21 evictions. The government aims to make tenancies open-ended while strengthening the rights of landlords through an enhanced Section 8 process. Getting the balance right in this reform is critical for the future of the rental sector.
If the government fails to implement the right changes, the rental sector could be seriously damaged. With the sector already struggling to meet housing demand, the average time it takes for a private landlord to repossess a property via the current system is almost four months. This inefficiency is unacceptable for both landlords and tenants.
It’s important to note that landlords generally view eviction as a last resort. The statistics show that landlords, not tenants, end only 10% of tenancies. A long-term tenant provides better returns for landlords, eliminating void periods and reducing the wear and tear from frequent moves. So, what are the legitimate reasons for eviction?
In Scotland, where court reforms were introduced before scrapping their version of Section 21, the new system appears to be working well. These reforms offer valuable lessons for the rest of the UK. Ensuring that Section 8 is strengthened and efficient will be crucial for a fair transition to the new regime.
There has been strong opposition to the government's plans from the lettings sector. Over 6,000 responses were received in the Residential Landlord Association’s survey on what a post-Section 21 private rented sector should look like, highlighting the sector’s concerns and desires. These responses will be used to inform the government's formal consultation.
If you’re a landlord or part of the lettings industry, you can still have your say. The RLA’s survey closes today, and its findings will directly influence the government's consultation. Visit the RLA website to share your opinion and make your voice heard in this important debate.
Meet our Expert Property Commentators