Rinlgley group logo
  • Home
  • Who We Are
    About Us Our People Awards Savings for Clients Results for Clients Green Management Strategies Market Overview Leasehold Reform Campaign Money Back Guarantee
  • What We Do
    • Block Management
      • Block Management Overview
      • for RTM Companies
      • for Freehold Management Companies
      • for Resident Management Companies
      • for Estates of Houses
      • for Freeholder Investors
      • Ground Rent Collection
      • How to Change Agent
      • Block Management Packages
      • Can't Afford an Agent?
      • Legal work & Tribunals
      • Section 20 Major Works
      • Ringley's Top 10 Tips
      • Staff on Site
      • Moving or Buying?
      • Report an Incident
    • Asset Management
      • Asset Management Overview
        • Asset Management Overview
        • Stabilised Assets
        • Project Monitoring
        • Mobilisation & Lease up
        • Asset Managers TechStack
        • Accounting & Reporting
        • Brands & URLs for sale
        • ESG Consultancy & Implementation
        • UK Build to Rent
        • UK Later Living
        • UK Coliving
        • UK Student Housing
        • BTR Smart PropTech
        • BTR Strategic Marketing
        • BTR Resident Experience
        • BTR Tenancy Management
        • Asset Management Clients
        • Site Finding/Digital Land Search
      • Law
        • Legal Services Overview
        • Our People
        • Recommendations
        • Right to Manage
        • Lease Extensions
        • Freehold Purchase
        • Absentee Freeholder
        • Court Appointed Manager
        • Conveyancing
        • Service Charge/Rent Arrears Recovery
        • Company Secretary
      • Valuation
        • Valuation Overview
        • Loan Security
        • Company Accounts
        • Lease Extensions
        • Freehold Purchase
        • Rent Reviews
        • Development Valuations
        • Insurance Valuations
        • Expert Witness & Litigation
        • Tax, Trusts & Accounts Valuations
        • Trading Business
        • Compulsory Purchase
        • Residential Valuations
      • Engineering
        • Engineering Overview
        • EWS1 Consultancy
        • Asbestos
        • Contract Administration
        • Fire Assesment
        • Homebuyer Survey
        • Building Survey
        • Schedules
        • Party Wall Matters
        • Principle Designer
        • Disability Access Audits
        • Small Building Works
      • Finance
        • Finance Overview
        • Get Accounts Quote
        • The Law & Property Accounts
        • Industry Update
        • To audit or Not?
      • Plant & Facilities Management
        • Plant & Facilities Management
        • Fire Door Inspection APP
      • Site Staffing Solutions
      • Leasehold Guidance
        • Leasehold Guidance Overview
        • Right to Manage
        • Buy Freehold
        • Court Appointed Manager
        • Absentee Freeholder
    • Insights
      Property Management Articles Property Management Blogs Rental Market Blogs Customer Comments FAQ - Ask Our Experts
    • E-books
    • Portal Login
    • Get In Touch
    • Clear Filter
    • Property Blog INDEX
    • PlanetRent Blog

    Is the new cladding fund just a leaseholder lottery?


    Responsive image


    Last week, Housing Secretary Robert Jenrick MP announced an extra £3.5 billion to fund replacement cladding on high-rise buildings above 18 metres. Good news? Not entirely.

    Yes, this is a substantial amount of money and thousands of leaseholders will be hugely relieved to know that they no longer have the spectre of huge bills and unsellable homes hanging over them. But the announcement still leaves a lot of questions unanswered.

    First, cladding campaigners and property industry commentators are unanimous in their verdict that the new fund, while very welcome, is not enough. Estimates nearer to £15 billion are thought to be realistic. And there was no mention of funding to tackle other fire safety issues, such as internal compartmentation, fire doors or combustible balconies. These will all be costly to fix. As the IRPM has pointed out, replacing the cladding without dealing with these other problems makes little sense.

    Second, buildings above 18 metres are not the only ones affected by fire safety problems. The Government says it will now provide long-term, low interest loans for leaseholders in blocks between 4-6 storeys, with no one paying more than £50 a month. But why should they have to pay at all just because they live in a low-rise block that may only be a few feet below 18 metres? That’s £600 every year – possibly for longer than the mortgage term, depending on the size of the remediation bill. Try selling a flat with an ongoing debt attached to it. How can that possibly be fair?

    And what about the leaseholders who live on estates with one or two blocks that need remediation while theirs doesn’t.  For some that means paying as per the lease schedule which might cover a group of blocks, when their block does not even have cladding.  No doubt for all blocks of flats insurance will be affected as risks are perceived, again costing leaseholders additional money to insure their home even without the need for remediation.

    Finally, developers will be expected to contribute to the cost of funding. But why single them out to fund repairs? Others in the construction chain are equally culpable for the issues that have come to light in the last three years and it seems wrong to insist developers shoulder the burden alone.  So far as we have heard, these materials have still not been withdrawn from sale.  You can still buy ACM cladding.  Yes building regulations have been updated to make it clearer what the standards are, but as long as 'bad stuff' is for sale, someone will fit it.  When asbestos was banned it was withdrawn from sale - why are we not seeing that here? 

    Robert Jenrick claimed that the new measures will “remove unsafe cladding, provide certainty for leaseholders and make developers pay for mistakes of the past.” We welcome the additional funding but are disappointed that the government has still not got this right.



    15/02/2021
    Author : Maryanne Bowring

    Social
    Facebook Linkedin Twitter Blogger

    Subscription

    Keep up to date

    (Weekly, fortnightly or monthly)


    To find out more what we do with your data, please read our Privacy Policy


    Insights, Blogs, Research, E-Books

    Landlord blog bg

    Landlord blog
    Read landlord blog
    Property blog bg

    Property blogs
    Read property blogs
    Articles bg

    Property articles
    Read property articles
    E book

    E-books
    Read E-books
    Facebook footer Instagram footer Linkedin footer Twitter footer
    Facebook footer
    Instagram footer
    Linkedin footer
    Twitter footer
    • Ringley Group
    • About us
    • CSR
    • BusyLiving
    • PlanetRent
    • Fire door inspection
    • Talk to us
    • Careers
    • Ask a Question
    • Insight
    • Articles
    • Blogs
    • Subscribe
    • What we do
    • Asset Management
    • Block Management
    • Facilities Management
    • Property Law
    • Surveying / Valuation
    • Building Engineering
    • Financial Services
    • Managing Agents
    • Block Management Locations
    • Co-working
    • Offices
    • London
    • Ringley House
    • 1 Castle Road
    • London
    • NW1 8PR
    • T: 0207 267 2900
    • Manchester
    • 11 Swan Street
    • Northern Quarter
    • Manchester
    • M4 5JJ
    • T: 0330 174 7777
    • Cardiff
    • 122 Bute Street
    • Cardiff Bay
    • Cardiff
    • CF10 5AE
    • T: 0330 174 7747
    • Email: solutions@ringley.co.uk
    • Emergency line 1: 0207 428 2056
    • Emergency line 2: 0207 267 2900
    • Report incident
    Privacy Policy
    Ringley Staff
    Ifsm Irpm member New iso Arla licensed Ombudsman services Rics vertical Gbc

    All content © copyright 2022. Ringley Limited. All Rights reserved. Ringley Limited, incorporated and registered in England and wales. Registered office: Ringley House, 1 Castle Road, London, NW1 8PR. Company No. 03302438
    Terms of use | Privacy Policy | Modern slavery act | COVID-19 risk assessment